Michigan Attorney General Opens Criminal Investigation Into False Child Welfare Call That Led Police to Pete Buttigieg’s Traverse City Home and Separated His Twins

Pete Buttigieg speaking at a podium during a public event

LANSING, MI — Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has opened an investigation into a false child welfare call that sent authorities to former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s Traverse City home and briefly separated him from his 4-year-old twins.

Nessel’s office described the incident as a malicious act and said it is looking at possible unlawful conduct as well as the risk that similar tactics could be used against other public figures. Buttigieg has said the call appeared to be aimed at him politically, and state police later confirmed the report was false.

The episode began last month, but the investigation announced Monday places new scrutiny on what Michigan officials say could amount to a felony under state law. Buttigieg and his family are now seeking answers about how the false report was handled and why it led to such a serious response.

State officials say the false report may have been meant to intimidate

The attorney general’s office said the case goes beyond a single false complaint. In a statement, the office said it is examining whether the incident was not only unlawful, but also part of a broader pattern of intimidation that could encourage copycat behavior.

Officials said they want to understand whether the complaint was filed in a way that made it appear credible when it was not. The office said a report like this should have triggered basic checks before authorities acted on allegations that could separate children from their family.

Nessel’s office said common sense should have raised doubts about the claim from the beginning. It also warned that similar tactics could be used against well-known residents and elected officials, which is one reason the office is treating the matter seriously.

Buttigieg says the false accusation led to a painful family ordeal

Buttigieg wrote in a July 1 blog post that police came to his house after an anonymous allegation claimed his children were in danger. He later said he learned during an interview with police that the accusation centered on a person who claimed to have met him at a conference.

According to Buttigieg, that person alleged he had committed violent crimes, prompting concern for the safety of his children. He said the situation quickly escalated into a deeply upsetting experience for his family and created immediate fear and confusion.

The former Cabinet secretary said authorities told him he could not be with his twins unsupervised until the children had been interviewed away from family members. Buttigieg has said the episode was both painful and infuriating for his family.

Police later confirmed the anonymous child safety claim was false

Michigan State Police later confirmed that the report that triggered the response was false. That confirmation is important to the attorney general’s office because it underscores how a misleading complaint can set off a major intervention before the facts are checked.

The office said complaints that could lead to children being removed from their parents demand careful review, especially when the allegation comes from a source that cannot be easily verified. Officials said there should be some clear connection between the source of the complaint and the family involved, or at least a reliable basis for the allegation.

Investigators have not publicly detailed who made the report or what steps, if any, were taken before authorities moved forward. The attorney general’s office did say the conduct could amount to a felony under Michigan law.

Buttigieg’s spokesperson says the family wants accountability

A spokesperson for Buttigieg said Monday that the family has been in contact with Michigan authorities and is seeking answers about what happened. The spokesperson said the episode has left the family angry and distressed.

Buttigieg has tried to move on from the incident publicly, including in an interview with Good Morning America last month. He said then that the family’s goal is to put the matter behind them, but he also argued that public service should not require accepting threats or intimidation as normal.

His comments reflected a broader concern that false accusations can push politics into a more dangerous place. While Buttigieg did not describe the matter as a routine dispute, he said it should not be treated as just another cost of being in public life.

Why Michigan officials say the case matters beyond one family

The attorney general’s office said it is also considering the wider effect of the incident. Officials warned that if false welfare complaints are used as a weapon, they could encourage others to try the same approach against public figures or other residents.

That concern is part of why the office described the case as a potential threat not only to Buttigieg’s family, but also to public trust. The investigation will look at whether the complaint crossed the line from false reporting into criminal conduct under state law.

Buttigieg, a prominent Democrat and a possible 2028 presidential contender, has become one of the most recognizable political names in the country. Yet the attorney general’s statement focused less on his profile than on the danger of using authorities and child welfare systems to carry out intimidation.